As a lousy golfer, I’m a big fan of mulligans. For those readers who don’t torture themselves on weekends or spoil long walks on grassy knolls, a mulligan is when a golfer replays a shot without penalty. In effect, a do-over. But they’re only allowed in casual play, not when the score matters. Every day counts in stock markets, however, but equity markets seem to be giving themselves a mulligan for yesterday’s declines anyway. The fact that it’s the first of the month and a Friday are almost certainly having an impact.
The nominal reason for today’s rally is the weaker-than-expected Nonfarm Payrolls report. October payrolls rose by only 12,000 – well below the 100k consensus – and the two-month revision was for -112k, 31k of which was for September’s report. That certainly seems to solidify the notion that the labor economy is weakening, thus opening the door for more aggressive rate cuts, even though the Bureau of Labor Statistics acknowledged that the number was likely affected by hurricanes and strikes. We saw bond yields fall sharply in the immediate aftermath, with the 2-year note yield down as much as 10 basis points and the 10-year falling by 5bp. Yet as we approach midday, the 2-year yield is up 1bp and the 10-year is up 6bp to 4.33%.
There are some who believe that 10-year yields above 4.3% would be a big negative for stocks. In theory, I don’t disagree. Higher yields provide competition for stocks and impede long-term valuations. But in at least in the short-term, those folks must have missed the memo about every dip being a buying opportunity. While there is a heavy degree of sarcasm in the prior sentence, it reflects the current equity trading mindset. If there is any reason whatsoever to bounce, equities will attempt to do so and traders will attempt to chase the rally for a while.
One reason for the bounce is the calendar. Many traders assume that new money flows into the market on the first day of a new month, and when combined with the largest decline in the S&P 500 (SPX) since early September, that seemed like a good enough reason to get overnight futures higher. And it’s much easier to base a day’s trading off the bond market’s initial reaction to an economic report rather than shift strategy when the bond traders do.
Remember also that today is Friday, a day when we have over 600 so-called 0DTE options. On most days we only have a handful of index and ETF options that expire; on Fridays, hundreds of the most popular single-stock options also expire. Expiring options have become a popular means for traders to chase and accelerate rallies, especially since 2021, when we first explained the phenomenon. The rally seems to be taking a lunch break right now; let’s see whether there is another push in the afternoon or some pre-weekend book squaring.
It would be understandable if we see some book squaring into the close. A deeper read of today’s employment report is not uniformly market friendly. The Unemployment Rate held steady at 4.1%, implying that there is neither a surge in newly jobless workers, nor a rush back into the labor force from those on the sidelines. It also calls into question the recent triggering of the “Sahm Rule.” Furthermore, Average Hourly Earnings rose 0.4% on a monthly basis, above the 0.3% consensus. That was offset by a downward revision of last month’s report, from 0.4% to 0.3%, but either way, consistent readings in the 0.3-0.4% range are not consistent with a 2% inflation target. That’s why Fed Funds expectations only moved up slightly.
Have a good weekend and get the most of your extra hour of sleep (we push clocks back in North America). Next week’s election will of course be the thing to watch.
Join The Conversation
If you have a general question, it may already be covered in our FAQs. If you have an account-specific question or concern, please reach out to Client Services.
Leave a Reply
Disclosure: Interactive Brokers
The analysis in this material is provided for information only and is not and should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. To the extent that this material discusses general market activity, industry or sector trends or other broad-based economic or political conditions, it should not be construed as research or investment advice. To the extent that it includes references to specific securities, commodities, currencies, or other instruments, those references do not constitute a recommendation by IBKR to buy, sell or hold such investments. This material does not and is not intended to take into account the particular financial conditions, investment objectives or requirements of individual customers. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Interactive Brokers, its affiliates, or its employees.
Disclosure: Options (with multiple legs)
Options involve risk and are not suitable for all investors. For information on the uses and risks of options, you can obtain a copy of the Options Clearing Corporation risk disclosure document titled Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options by clicking the link below. Multiple leg strategies, including spreads, will incur multiple transaction costs. "Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options"
Disclosure: ETFs
Any discussion or mention of an ETF is not to be construed as recommendation, promotion or solicitation. All investors should review and consider associated investment risks, charges and expenses of the investment company or fund prior to investing. Before acting on this material, you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular circumstances and, as necessary, seek professional advice.
since the jobs’ # aint telling us much and the other latest data supported higher inflation prospects, I would think a ‘pass’ by the Fed is the best answer next week. to keep lowering rates without real data supporting same is not wise.
The fed will cut 25bps-we still have a long way to go for them to get us back to neutral
I’ve heard it said that bonds could be competitive with stocks once they exceeded xx%, but that hasn’t been so since Volker killed inflation. Okay, I’ve noticed that maybe once or twice a decade, bonds would have a better return than stocks. But in what decade would you have done better investing in bonds rather than stocks? Yes I have a very small position in an investment grade domesticate bond, and a small foreign bond fund, but that is merely to force me to be aware of the movement of bond yields. So you say “higher yields provide competition for stocks”, but would you really be satisfied with a annual return of 4.33% for the next decade? Frankly I been averaging more than 3% just from dividends and the net premiums received from selling options, and that’s before capital gains. Yes, I’ve heard the argument for adding bonds to provide stability to a portfolio, but it seems to me that since the 90”s it is more like adding a dead weight.
Bonds are either for temporary parking (but I still prefer money market regardless of the rate) or for suckers. I am happily making 20 to 40% /year with stocks and options. The day I will invest in bonds will be day I lost my balls.